AI Pens California’s Bar Exam and Delivers a Comedic Catastrophe
“California’s Bar Exam Was Written by AI And It Was a Total Disaster”
“To every aspiring lawyer who sat for the Bar exam in California last month — we’re really sorry,” begins the scathing review of California’s recent innovation on the DailyAI.com website. Apparently, the state decided to let an AI system write the notoriously difficult academic rite of passage. Unfortunately, it was less of a Silicon Valley success story and more of a sitcom-level mishap.
Arguably, entrusting such a laborious task to a machine was a reasonable idea in theory. Yet, technology is not so foolproof. The AI rivaled Shakespeare’s mastery of tragicomic writing, producing a truly disastrous performance masquerading as a professional Bar exam.
When considering the AI’s attempt at writing an intellectual property law question, one might laugh or cry at the irony. Struggling to grasp the subtleties of intellectual property rights, it ended up penning a question eerily similar to one from a past paper. Seemingly hinting, albeit unintentionally, at the notion of plagiarizing itself, the AI’s gaffe became a running joke in the legal community overnight.
The fumble didn’t stop there, no. The Artificial Intelligence also tested law students on wildly outdated laws – bring in the horsed carriages! It’s as if the AI was under the impression that legal advancements became stagnant after the 19th century. A touch anachronistic, wouldn’t you agree?
It’s admirable that California’s powers-that-be sought to integrate technology into the strenuous test process. Indeed, automation can provide efficiency and uniformity. Yet one cannot discount the critical importance of human touch. Machines might not lose papers or misspell words, but they do lack the ability to understand nuanced human laws.
Yet, brace yourselves for the surprise – the artificial intelligence writing the Bar exam was still considered a success. An odd conclusion, considering the mismatched questions, the plagiarism accusations, and inappropriate testing of non-existent laws. Is it a wonder that the aspiring lawyers are more flustered than triumphant?
Ultimately, this fiasco serves as a stark lesson. While AI holds great promise, it must be carefully managed and monitored. Especially when it comes to complex professional domains like law. And to the brave legal warriors who battled this bot-written exam, solid proof of the maxim; sometimes it’s laughter, not law, that’s the best defense.